Evidence fitness and epistemic risk
How credible evidence can remain incomplete, unsuitable or misunderstood when applied to a particular decision and setting.
Research & Insights
Studying how evidence becomes institutional action.
EAI’s research examines how evidence is interpreted, how judgment and authority are exercised, how affected knowledge is considered, and how institutions remain accountable for decisions and their consequences.
Research priorities
A focused agenda for decision-system research.
Institutional decision systems
How evidence, judgment, authority, implementation and accountability interact within organizations.
Human judgment and authority
How people interpret evidence, exercise discretion and retain responsibility within complex decision environments.
Meaningful human oversight of AI
How institutions preserve informed human authority and accountability when AI informs consequential decisions.
Affected knowledge and equity
How lived, professional and locally grounded knowledge shapes decisions and whose realities remain absent.
Accountability, learning and correction
How decisions remain reviewable, contestable and responsive to consequences and emerging evidence.
Research portfolio
Applied and collaborative research in development.
EAI is developing research projects aligned with its decision-systems agenda. We welcome inquiries from institutions, researchers and funders interested in building rigorous, locally grounded work in these areas.
Outputs
Research designed to be used and examined.
Publications and Decision Briefs
Peer-reviewed research, working papers, reports and accessible briefs focused on defined institutional decision challenges.
Methods and Tools
Public-facing models, guides and selected resources that support reflection, institutional learning and responsible evidence use.
EAI Decision Watch
A focused scan of developments involving AI-mediated decisions, evidence adoption, human judgment, institutional authority, accountability and oversight.
Commentary
EAI perspectives on research, policy, institutional decisions and public developments viewed through a decision-system lens.
Research integrity
Development status will always be stated clearly.
EAI distinguishes completed work from research in development, proposed collaborations and emerging initiatives. Publications and projects will identify authors, partners, funding and institutional affiliations appropriately.